I don't blog
Iceland’s Collision Of Two Worlds

all-thats-interesting:

Aurora Iceland Volcano

In this impressive photograph, an aurora meets a volcanic eruption in Iceland. Even though its photographic display is a strange one. it certainly is captivating.

eachwildidea:

descroissants:

Derweze, also known as the door to hell, is a 70 meter wide hole in the middle of the Karakum desert in Turkmenistan. The hole was formed in 1971 when a team of soviet geologists had their drilling rig collapse when they hit a cavern filled with natural gas. In an attempt to avoid poisonous discharge, they decided to burn it off, thinking that the gas would be depleted in only a few days. Derweze is still burning today 


Wow! And we thought the BP Oil spill was bad.

stfusexists:

It ain’t over yet, but let us all let our uteruses breathe a sigh of relief today.

Thank goodness!!!! I did not want that man anywhere near the Presidency.  

Reblog if you don’t support Rick Santorum in 2012.

stfuconservatives:

stfuprolife:

unforgivingpessimist:

cruelyouth:

westofthesun-eastofthemoon:

God look at the notes

Yeah, only 5 million?  Why isn’t there more?

and counting….

Holy shit.

Not satisfied until that hits ~6.79 Billion Notes.

-Joe

religiousragings:

Okay.  I’ve been avoiding Valentine’s Day posts, but this is just too good to pass up. :)
~ Steve

religiousragings:

Okay. I’ve been avoiding Valentine’s Day posts, but this is just too good to pass up. :)

~ Steve

religiousragings:

Maybe the biblical Jesus just went from carpentry into shoes, and we’ve been mistranslating it all along.

THIS! 

religiousragings:

Maybe the biblical Jesus just went from carpentry into shoes, and we’ve been mistranslating it all along.

THIS! 

jtotheizzoe:

climateadaptation:

A few days ago, the Wall Street Journal published an anti-climate change op-ed signed by 16 scientists. None of the authors are climate scientists, nor do peer review research in the field.

No matter, it got published anyway. And shortly after the piece was published, real climate scientists came out off the woodwork to condemn the WSJ and the so-called scientists that wrote it. Andrew Revkin of the NYTimes has been tracking the pushback, here.

I’m happy to say that the WSJ published a rebuttal from real climate scientists and researchers, and it is epic. A taste:

Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate

Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work. If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a large number of the proposed operations.

You published “No Need to Panic About Global Warming” (op-ed, Jan. 27) on climate change by the climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology. While accomplished in their own fields, most of these authors have no expertise in climate science. The few authors who have such expertise are known to have extreme views that are out of step with nearly every other climate expert. This happens in nearly every field of science. For example, there is a retrovirus expert who does not accept that HIV causes AIDS. And it is instructive to recall that a few scientists continued to state that smoking did not cause cancer, long after that was settled science.

Climate experts know that the long-term warming trend has not abated in the past decade. In fact, it was the warmest decade on record. Observations show unequivocally that our planet is getting hotter.

Via Revkin

Previously, for background.

When you read this sentence to yourself, it’s likely that you hear the words in your head. Now, in what amounts to technological telepathy, others are on the verge of being able to hear your inner dialogue too. By peering inside the brain, it is possible to reconstruct speech from the activity that takes place when we hear someone talking. Because this brain activity is thought to be similar whether we hear a sentence or think the same sentence, the discovery brings us a step closer to broadcasting our inner thoughts to the world without speaking. The implications are enormous – people made mute through paralysis or locked-in syndrome could regain their voice. It might even be possible to read someone’s mind. Imagine a musician watching a piano being played with no sound, says Brian Pasley at the University of California, Berkeley. “If a pianist were watching a piano being played on TV with the sound off, they would still be able to work out what the music sounded like because they know what key plays what note,” Pasley says. His team has done something analogous with brain waves, matching neural areas to their corresponding noises.

Really? Scientists are immoral and need to be regulated? Dear me! Hide me from those evil scientists who want to cure me of diseases and pain! How immoral of them! Don’t let the evil scientists teach me anything about the world in their reality based warped point of view! Mathematics are so diabolical! Just look at those poor children slaving away in schools, being forced to learn math and science. We should free these poor children from their clutches. They would be much happier sewing beads to shirts that are being sold at Wal-Mart, anyway.

nonplussedbyreligion:

Kentucky, really? This is your priority? ~ Kim

Kentucky Gov. Cuts Education Funding While Preserving Tax Breaks For Biblically-Themed Amusement Park

By Travis Waldron on Jan 20, 2012 at 11:45 am

When Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear (D) proposed his 2012-2013 budget this…

Shameful! (I feel like a little old woman when I say that! :) )